Appeal of Licht & Semonoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that district court expressly found that attorneys’ “primary purpose in deposing [witnesses] was to harass”
• noting that despite delay in appeal of sanction order, “[t]he firm’s ethical obligation is to its client’s best interests”
• noting that delayed appeal would allow appellate court to view case as a whole
• noting that district court expressly <br>found that attorneys' \primary purpose in deposing [witnesses] was <br>to harass\
• observing that some courts had considered attorney’s nonparticipation determinative of jurisdiction
• noting <br>that despite delay in appeal of sanction order, \[t]he firm's <br>ethical obligation is to its client's best interests\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).