Appeal of Keiper
Citations
- 124 Pa. 193
- 23 W.N.C. 260
- 16 A. 744
- 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1020
Syllabus
<p>(a) A testator bequeathed a legacy of $1,000 in trust “ to be used only toward the erection of a Reformed Church at Elizabethville, and shall not be paid by the said trustee until he is perfectly satisfied that no debts of any kind whatever rest on said church property, or until said amount with accrued interest would place the church entirely out of debt.”</p> <p>(5) The erection of the church at the place designated was in contemplation at the date of the will; it was begun and completed in the lifetime of the testator who himself paid $723 towards its erection, and at the adjudication of the account of his executors it was shown that there was still an outstanding building debt of $144, the most of which had been assumed by members.</p> <p>1. In such case, tlio legacy was not adeemed on the ground claimed, that the contributions made by the testator during his lifetime towards the erection of the church should be taken as intended to be in lion of the legacy, or on the ground that, as the sole object for which the legacy was given was the erection of the church, it could not be applied to any other purpose.</p> <p>2. Nor was the legacy adeemed pro tanto, as the language of the will made it plain that the testator contemplated and desired that the church building should be erected and free from debt when his legacy should be paid, authorizing his trustee to apply it to the building debt, only on condition that it would extinguish the whole of it.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that claimants 5 who were only available to work the night shift due to child care obligations during the day were eligible to receive unemployment benefits
- claimant had a necessitous and compelling reason to quit where her night position was eliminated by employer and she was unable to locate suitable child care in order to accept a day position with that employer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.