Appeal of Caitlyn Wittenauer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring to agency’s interpretation of “necessary” in telecommuni- cations statute as referring to “a strong connection” between means and ends
• deferring to agency’s interpretation of “necessary” in telecommunications statute as referring to “a strong connection” between means and ends
• deferring to agency’s interpretation of “necessary” in telecommunications statute as referring to “a strong connection” between means and ends
• deferring to agency’s interpretation of “necessary” in telecommunications statute as referring to “a strong connection” between means and ends
• finding the plaintiff could not bring an as-applied challenge to regulation requiring portability of cellular telephone numbers until the FCC took enforcement action against the plaintiff under the rule
• specifically rejecting an “indispensable” connotation of “necessary” as used in the Communications Act’s enforcement forbearance provision, § 10(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).