· 6/8/2001
Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Citations
- 251 F.3d 1026
- 346 U.S. App. D.C. 211
- 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20670
- 52 ERC (BNA) 1513
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11852
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An agency cannot be faulted for failing to address such issues that were not raised by petitioners.”
- “[R]es judicata bars relitigation not only of matters determined in a previous litigation[,] but also ones that a party could have raised.”
- “[A] party must initially present its comments to the agency during the rulemaking in order for the court to consider the issue.” (citation, internal quotation marks, and alteration omitted)
- “It is black-letter administrative law that 18 absent special circumstances, a party must initially present its comments to the agency 19 during the rulemaking in order for the court to consider the issue.”
- “‘[A] party must initially present its comments to the agency during the rulemaking in order for the court to consider the issue.’ ” (quoting Tex Tin Corp. v. EPA, 935 F.2d 1321, 1323 (D.C. Cir. 1991))
- “It is black-letter administrative law that absent special circumstances, a party must initially present its comments to the agency during the rulemaking in order for the court to consider the issue.” (citation, internal quotation marks, and alteration omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Sentelle, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.