Apotex Corp. v. Merck & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fraud 20 on the court does not include statements made by adverse party 21 that moving party had opportunity to challenge in court
• holding that fraud 20 on the court does not include statements made by adverse party 21 that moving party had opportunity to challenge in court
• holding fraud on the court requires “material subversion of the legal process”
• “[Fraud-on-the-court] requires rigorous proof, as do other challenges to final judgment, lest the finality established by Rule 60(b) be overwhelmed by continuing attacks on the judgment.”
• discussing “fraud on the court” under former Rule 60(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).