Skip to main content
· 3/26/2004

Apostolico v. Orlando Regional Health Care System, Inc.

Citations

  • 871 So. 2d 283
  • 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3847
  • 2004 WL 587660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appellate court does not defer to the trial court on matters of law
  • concluding that for presuit purposes, a nurse or any other medical professional, with appropriate experience or training, may qualify as a medical expert to corroborate that there were reasonable grounds to initiate a medical malpractice action
  • affidavit from nurse opining that hospital and its staff failed to meet the appropriate standard of care was deemed sufficient to satisfy statutory pre-suit requirements
  • “complex medical and factual issues are involved in a determination of proximate cause in a medical malpractice case”
  • \complex medical and factual issues are involved in a determination of proximate cause in a medical malpractice case\
  • “We review a trial court’s disposition of a motion to dismiss de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orfinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.