Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the plaintiff has not shown irreparable injury because the plaintiff’s alleged loss of contract is speculative and the information the plaintiff sought protect is not proven to be a trade secret
• “[B]efore a court exercises personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the procedural requirement of service of a summons must be satisfied.”
• “[B]efore a court exercises personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the procedural requirement of service of a summons [with a copy of the complaint] must be satisfied.”
• [A] preliminary injunction cannot be issued when there are disputed issues of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).