Apollo Fuel Oil v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the same rule to conclude the corporation knew of intentional misconduct through its employees’ knowledge
• applying Burger to reject a Fourth Amendment challenge to taking samples from a truck's propulsion tanks to determine whether the driver was impermissibly using dyed, nontaxable fuel
• “In general, when an agent is employed to perform certain duties for his principal and acquires knowledge material to those duties, the agent’s knowledge is imputed to the principal.”
• both undertaking Burger analysis in determining validity of commercial vehicle inspections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).