APOLLO ENTERPRISES, INC. v. ScripNet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging the “comprehensive scheme whereby employees who are covered by workers’ compensation insurance and incur ‘compensable’ injuries are provided the exclusive remedy of ‘workers’ compensation benefits’ . . . in lieu of common-law remedies.”
• “As we explained in Eckerd, the right to recover any particular amount of reimbursement from a workers’ compensation insurance carrier for [health care] services provided ... to an injured worker is entirely a function of the workers’ compensation act and Division rules.”
• describing regulatory framework for resolution' of medical fee dispute
• “As we explained in Eckerd, the right to recover any particular amount of reimbursement from a workers’ compensation insurance carrier for [health care] services provided . . . to an injured worker is entirely a function of the workers’ compensation act and Division rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).