Apodaca v. Town of Tome Land Grant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing whether denial of intervention is appealable as of right and concluding that orders denying intervention are final to allow them to be appealable
• “The determination of timeliness is a matter peculiarly within the discretion of the trial court.”
• denial of motion to intervene upheld when filed \four and one-half years after . . . litigation started\ and where \[o]ther means [were] available to . . . protect and assert the[] rights\ of the intervenors
• denial of motion to intervene upheld when filed “four and one-half years after ... litigation started” and where “[o]ther means [were] available to ... protect and assert the[ ] rights” of the intervenors
• denial of motion to intervene upheld when filed “four and one-half years after . . . litigation started” and where “[o]ther means [were] available to . . . protect and assert the[] rights” of the intervenors
• denial of a motion to intervene is an appealable order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).