Aplin v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state court had not 12 complied with the fourth requirement of Waller test for courtroom closure, but because habeas 13 petitioner had failed to raise that objection to the district court he “forfeited [the] issue on 14 appeal”
• holding that state court had not 12 complied with the fourth requirement of Waller test for courtroom closure, but because habeas 13 petitioner had failed to raise that objection to the district court he “forfeited [the] issue on 14 appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).