Apex Plumbing Supply, Incorporated Harold Falchick v. U.S. Supply Company, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court properly confirmed award because “appellant failed to qualify under any ground … allowing the vacation or modification of an arbitration award”
• holding that district court properly confirmed award because “appellant failed to qualify under any ground … allowing the vacation or modification of an arbitration award”
• concluding that U.S. Supply “did not meet its burden under section eleven in order to modify the award”
• noting that “to allow full scrutiny of [arbitration] awards would frustrate the purpose of having arbitration at all”
• noting that “even a mistake of fact or misinterpretation of law by an arbitrator provides insufficient grounds for the modification of an award.”
• stating that even a “questionable” decision by an arbitrator “does not constitute exceeding his power”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).