APD Holdings, Inc. v. Reidel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a ruling on a motion to continue is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• determining that the denial of a motion for continuance “created an obvious injustice” for moving party because an important witness was unable to attend the hearing
• “Florida courts have held that it is reversible error to refuse to grant a motion for continuance where a party or his or her counsel is unavailable for physical or mental reasons which prevent a fair and adequate presentation of the party’s case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).