Apana v. Kapano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board errs when it fails to address all potentially applicable provisions of law and regulation
• holding that the Board is required to discuss in its decision all “potentially applicable” provisions of law and regulation
• holding that Board is required to consid er, and discuss in its decision, all “potentially applicable” provisions of law and regulation
• holding that the Board is required to discuss in its decision all \potentially applicable\ provisions of law and regulation
• holding that Board is required to consider, and discuss in its decision, all \potentially applicable\ provisions of law and regulation
• holding that “where the record does not adequately reveal the current state of a claimant’s disability, a VA examination must be conducted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).