Apa v. Rotman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the technical requirements of the statute should not be mechanically applied to deprive a plaintiff of his substantive rights.”
• holding that \the technical requirements of the statute should not be mechanically applied to deprive a plaintiff of his substantive rights.\
• holding that “the technical requirements of the statute should not be mechanically applied to deprive a plaintiff of his substantive rights.”
• observing that, “where a minor technical error is involved, permitting a plaintiff to amend [the expert affidavit] more closely furthers the purpose of [the statute] than dismissing with prejudice”
• section 2 — 622 must be liberally construed so that cases may be quickly and finally decided according to the parties’ substantive rights
• “[W]here a minor technical error is involved, permitting a plaintiff to amend more closely furthers the purpose of section 2—622 than dismissing with prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).