Anyaso v. United States Capitol Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he mere conclusory assertion that [the plaintiff] might have had additional opportunities for overtime,” but for the defendant’s action, was not sufficient to show an adverse employment action
• finding that courts analyze both discrimination and retaliation claims brought under the CAA using the same standards as claims brought under Title VII
• finding that courts analyze both discrimination and retaliation claims brought under the CAA using the same standards as claims brought under Title VII
• “[Plaintiff’s] suspension for five days without pay constitutes a materially adverse action for purposes of establishing a prima facie case of discrimination because it caused him financial loss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).