Skip to main content
· 3/26/1986

Antuk v. Antuk

Citations

  • 130 Wis. 2d 340
  • 387 N.W.2d 80
  • 1986 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where an affidavit concerning a promissory note was “inconsistent with the attached payment history, and no explanation was given for the discrepancies,” a trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the creditor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Nettesheim, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.