Antony v. Duty Free Americas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \fraudulent joinder doctrine provides an exception to the general rule prohibiting courts from considering evidence extrinsic to the facts in the complaint\
• “fraudulent joinder doctrine provides an exception to the general rule prohibiting courts from considering evidence extrinsic to the facts in the complaint”
• “[T]he fraudulent joinder doctrine provides an exception to the general rule [on a motion to dismiss]prohibiting courts from considering evidence extrinsic to the facts in the complaint.”
• “[T]he fraudulent joinder doctrine provides an exception to the general rule prohibiting courts from considering evidence extrinsic to the facts in the complaint.” (citing Mills, 178 F.Supp.2d at 6)
• “Plaintiff is not entitled to another bite at the apple simply because the Court did not rule in his favor.” (First citing In re Wedgestone Fin., 142 B.R. 7, 8 (Bankr.D.Mass. 1992); and then citing Froudi v. United States, 22 Cl. Ct. 290, 300 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).