Antonson v. Ekvall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that tort claim not specifically pleaded or presented at trial was waived when it was raised for first time in a motion for new trial
• holding that a claim was not before the district court when “the pleadings were general enough to have possibly made out a claim on that theory, [but] there was no language in the complaint that would alert anyone to a claim” based on that theory
• stating claim made “too late” when made for the first time in a motion for a new trial
• rejecting an argument as too late when raised for the first time in posttrial motion
• stating claim made “too late” when made for the first time in a motion for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).