Antonio Rosario Jose Jeres Antonio Ramirez v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate court may raise issues (D.C. Cir. 1995); United States v. Leonard, 50 F.3d 1152, of default sua sponte where necessary to protect, inter alia, 1157-58 (2d Cir. 1995
• finding that “inculpatory statements” made during plea colloquies were enough for “any reasonable juror [to] only conclude that” defendants violated § 924(c)
• considering petitioners’ inculpatory statements made during plea allocution in determining whether no reasonable juror would find petitioners guilty
• considering petitioners’ inculpatory plea allocution statements in rejecting petitioners’ actual innocence claims in the context of Section 2255 petition
• establishing a multi-factor test to relieve the government's waiver of a Bailey petitioner's default
• no \cause\ for failure to raise Bailey claim on direct appeal despite the fact that an \appeal would have been doomed\ under then-existing law of the Second Circuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).