Antonio Perez-Arceo v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying stay because plaintiff failed to show likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, as plaintiff only argued economic loss
• awarding deposition costs of opposing party’s expert witness, even though the party did not cite the deposition in summary judgment briefing
• placing burden on party seeking costs to demonstrate deposition transcripts were “necessarily obtained”
• declining to consider additional stay factors upon failure of factors one and two
• denying a plaintiff’s request to stay enforcement of the Bill of Costs pending the appeal, noting that a stay pending appeal is an “intrusion into the ordinary process of administration and judicial review” (citing Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 427 (2009)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).