Antonio Lamount Strattman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking into account the closing arguments of counsel in assessing the adequacy of instructions
• taking into account the closing arguments of counsel in assessing the adequacy of instructions
• “[S]pecific intent to do an act may be inferred from the circumstances of the doing of the act itself.”
• jurors could infer intent from forced entry and unsatisfactory explanation for entry
• jurors could infer intent from forced entry and unsatisfactory explanation for entry
• jury can infer intent from forced entry and unsatisfactory explanation for entry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).