Antonio Islas-Veloz v. Matthew Whitaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that Washington Revised Code § 9.68A.090(1) is such a crime
• “The Court’s more recent decisions in Johnson and Dimaya did not reopen inquiry into the constitutionality of the phrase.”
• same for “communicating with a minor for immoral purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barbosa v. Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2019-03-28· cited 118×
• Joel Silva v. Merrick Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-03-30· cited 89×
• Maria Jauregui-Cardenas v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-01-13· cited 34×
• Agustin Ortega-Lopez v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-10-20· cited 18×
• Murillo-Chavez v. Bondi
  Ninth Circuit· 2025-02-13· cited 17×
• Pedro Aguirre Barbosa v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2019-03-28· cited 12×
• Nabil Syed v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-08-12· cited 11×
• Ruperto Hernandez Zarate v. U.S. Attorney General
  Eleventh Circuit· 2022-02-18· cited 8×
• Pattie Walcott v. Merrick Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-12-22· cited 6×
• Eva Gonzalez Romo v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2019-08-14· cited 5×
• Jose Diaz-Flores v. Merrick Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-04-06· cited 3×
• Joel Silva v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-07-10
• Dulce Zaragoza v. Merrick B. Garland
  Seventh Circuit· 2022-11-08