Skip to main content
· 5/6/1991

Antonio Diaz v. United States

Citations

  • 930 F.2d 832
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8306
  • 1991 WL 58315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding petitioner failed to establish prejudice where he offered only “after the fact testimony concerning his desire to plead”
  • concluding the defendant failed to establish prejudice when he offered only “after the fact testimony concerning his desire to plead”
  • concluding the defendant failed to establish prejudice when he offered only “after the fact testimony concerning his desire to plead”
  • finding that defendant’s awareness of offered plea agreement contradicted claim that he was denied an opportunity to reject the offer
  • rejecting defendant’s claim that he would have accepted a plea agreement when he had not indicated any desire to plead guilty prior to his conviction
  • finding no ineffective assistance where petitioner did “not allege that but for his attorney’s errors, he would have accepted the plea offer” and cites “no evidence to indicate that prior to his conviction he expressed any desire to plead guilty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Clark, Edmondson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.