Antonio de Venegas v. Sessions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Contract] terms that relate to pricing, valuation, monetary payments, and financial information should be protected.”
• “[T]erms that relate to pricing, valuation, monetary payments, and financial information should be protected.”
• “[C]ourts have recognized that even terms of highly confidential agreements—such as settlement agreements—may need to be disclosed, such as when the parties seek interpretative assistance from the court or otherwise move to enforce a provision of that agreement.” (internal punctuation omitted)
• protecting from disclosure “market share information”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).