· 8/20/2002
Antonio Casas-Chavez Clementina Avila-Espinoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Citations
- 300 F.3d 1088
- 2002 Daily Journal DAR 9527
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16690
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the alien’s Notice of Appeal satisfied the specificity requirement and remanding for consideration of the merits where the alien checked the box indicating that he would file a brief but never did so
- remanding to the BIA where “[p]etitioners[’] [notice had] directed the BIA’s 4 attention to specific portions of the immigration judge’s opinion as well as to evidence supporting their interpretation that the [IJ] erred in not suspending deportation proceedings”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lay, Ferguson, Tallman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.