Skip to main content
· 8/20/2002

Antonio Casas-Chavez Clementina Avila-Espinoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 300 F.3d 1088
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 9527
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the alien’s Notice of Appeal satisfied the specificity requirement and remanding for consideration of the merits where the alien checked the box indicating that he would file a brief but never did so
  • remanding to the BIA where “[p]etitioners[’] [notice had] directed the BIA’s 4 attention to specific portions of the immigration judge’s opinion as well as to evidence supporting their interpretation that the [IJ] erred in not suspending deportation proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Ferguson, Tallman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.