Skip to main content
· 3/30/1994

Antonio C. Mastrobuono and Diana G. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., a Corporation, Nick Diminico, Richard F. Benzer and Mark Stevenson

Citations

  • 20 F.3d 713
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5989
  • 1994 WL 103063

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • asserting that “[t]he linchpin of qualified immunity is the objective reasonableness of the officer’s actions; objective reasonableness is also applied in analyzing the merits of Fourth Amendment excessive-force claims
  • applying Illinois conflicts law, state of principal place of business was reasonable for choice of law provision
  • applying Illinois conflicts law, state of principal place of business was reasonable for choice of law provision
  • objection to demand for punitive damages raised after proofs in arbitration had closed held not waived where no prejudice was shown
  • objection to demand for punitive damages raised after proofs in arbitration had closed held not waived where no prejudice was shown

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Skinner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.