Anton Ivezaj and Ljena Doljevic v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that even if there were evidence in the record that the IJ was overly abrupt or intimidating, “[petitioners] have no right not to have their feelings hurt by a ‘no nonsense’ IJ”
• finding that the judge’s actions, while abrupt, constituted attempts to “control the pace of the hearings, and to focus the hearings on relevant mat- ters,” and failed to establish a violation of due process
• noting that evidence that an ethnic minority was persecuted “was insufficient to show a well- founded fear where the [] applicant for asylum could produce no evidence that he might be singled out for persecution”
• noting, in the context of a due-process claim, that petitioners “have no right not to have them feelings hurt by a ‘no nonsense’ IJ”
• “due process requires that [petitioner] be given an opportunity to be heard----”
• taking judicial notice of persecution of Albanians by Serbs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).