Antoinette M. Marino, Party in Interest-Appellant v. Pioneer Edsel Sales, Incorporated Clutter Motor Sales, Incorporated Ricky Clutter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• arguing that “preventing” a district court “from deciding whether [a lawyer] is entitled to attorney’s fees for work she allegedly performed in connection with [a lawsuit] would thwart [the court’s] ability to manage” the case
• affirming district court’s finding that it had ancillary jurisdiction over defendant’s motion for a determination on attorney’s fees
• discussing \con- tinuing jurisdiction\ in terms of a district court’s ability to resolve dis- putes related to its prior orders
• “It is well-settled that a federal court may exercise ancillary jurisdiction to enforce its judgments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).