Anthony Wilson v. Billy Groaning and Chris Dunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “highly inflamma- tory and totally irrelevant” testimony was adequately cured by court’s prompt striking of testimony and later instruc- tions to disregard
• \Leaving out this evidence would have left the jury with an unduly sanitized and incomplete version of the facts.\
• “Evidence is relevant if its exclusion would leave a chronological and conceptual void in the story.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).