Skip to main content
· 11/18/1889

Anthony v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Citations

  • 132 U.S. 172
  • 10 S. Ct. 53
  • 33 L. Ed. 301
  • 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1857

Syllabus

<p>An exception to the refusal of the presiding judge at a jury trial to instruct the jury in language prayed for by counsel is of no avail, if the refusal be followed by instructions in the general charge, substantially to the same effect, but in the language of the court.</p> <p>A general exception to the whole of a charge to the jury will not avail a plaintiff in error if the charge contains distinct propositions and any one of them is free from objections.</p>

Judges: Field

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.