Anthony v. Larios

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, where the plaintiff filed suit against another driver, alleging that he was an uninsured motorist, the plaintiff’s UM carrier answered in its own name, “raising the affirmative defense that [the tortfeasor] may not be uninsured”
• noting that, where the plaintiff filed suit against another driver, alleging that he was an uninsured motorist, the plaintiff’s UM carrier answered in its own name, “raising the affirmative defense that [the tortfeasor] may not be uninsured”
• defendant driver's admission by default that he was an uninsured motorist does not bind plaintiff's uninsured motorist carrier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).