Anthony v. Beal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the evaluation of witness credibility and the weight given to witnesses’ testimony are issues for the jury
• explaining that, in order to preserve a state constitutional claim, the defendant must “raise it in the trial court” and “specifically invoke a provision of the State Constitution in his brief”
• “Because the defendant has not developed his constitutional arguments, we decline to address them.” (quoting State v. Lott, 879 A.2d 1167, 1173 (N.H. 2005))
• “Because the defendant has not developed his constitutional arguments, we decline to address them.” (quoting State v. Lott, 879 A.2d 1167, 1173 (N.H. 2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).