Anthony Storino Frank Storino v. Borough of Point Pleasant Beach, a Municipal Entity of the State of New Jersey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \one cannot describe how the [plaintiffs] will be injured without beginning the explanation with the word 'if' \
• “[W]ell-settled precedent makes clear that it is only possible to find third-party standing when there is also an injury in fact alleged by the first party plaintiff.”
• “Moreover, absent jurisdiction over the federal claim, the District Court did not have supplemental jurisdiction over the [plaintiff’s] state law claims, and thus should have dismissed those claims as well.”
• property owners within the borough lacked standing, because they had not suffered injury to their property; nor could they “impute” standing based on “the legal rights or interests of [other] parties”
• “[B]ecause the Storinos lack standing, the District Court lacked original jurisdiction over the federal claim, and it therefore could not exercise supplemental jurisdiction [over state law matters].” (first citing United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 725 (1966
• “The Court has recognized a limited right of litigants to bring actions on behalf of third parties only when the following three criteria are met: (1) the litigant has suffered an injury in fact giving him a sufficiently concrete interest in the outcome of the issue; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).