Anthony Sneed v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Admis- sions in the specification regarding the prior art are binding on the patentee for purposes of a later inquiry into obviousness.”
• “Under the plain language of the statute, a person who provides a service that assists another in committing patent infringement may be subject to liability under § 271(b) for active inducement of infringement, but not under § 271(c) for contributory infringement.”
• “The 1952 Act did not make a substantive change in the law of contributory 17 MCKESSON TECH v. EPIC SYSTEMS infringement, but it divided the judicially created category of contributory infringement into two statutory subsec- tions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).