Skip to main content
· 8/25/2023

Anthony Sheridan Sheridan Marketing Group, Inc. D/B/A SMG Construction Robert Sheridan And Linda Sheridan v. C. G. Haydon, D/B/A Haydon Concepts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming Board’s authority to determine appropriateness of different bargaining units by decisions of general applicability
  • remanding a unit determination case to the Board since the Board’s “lack of articulated reasons for the decisions in and distinctions among these [unit determination] cases” frustrated review
  • case remanded where Board's action could not properly be reviewed because Board failed to articulate reasons for its decision
  • NLRB orders which change prior positions must be accompanied with adequate explanation for the change
  • Board abuses its discretion where decisions are inconsistent and Board provides no rationale that suggests that factor inappropriate under the statute was not conclusively considered
  • NLRB orders which change pri- or positions must be accompanied with adequate explanation for the change

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.