Anthony Rohlf, TDCJ No. 2089530 v. Maria E. Ibarra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that the . . . 1 (FAAAA) expressly preempts [the requirement to] . . . display designated placards on its 2 vehicles” in order to park at a port
• finding preemption despite form of requirement imposed when municipality “exercise[s] classic regulatory authority”
• criticizing State efforts to “avoid preemption by shifting their regulatory focus” to different companies within the same supply chain because it did not “make[] any difference” that the State chose “an indirect but wholly effective means” of achieving a preempted goal
• criticizing State efforts to “avoid preemption by shifting their regulatory focus” to different companies within the same supply chain because it did not “make[] any difference” that the State chose “an indirect but wholly effective means” of achieving a preempted goal
• criticizing State efforts to “avoid preemption by shifting their regulatory focus” to different companies within the same supply chain because it did not “make[] any difference” that the State chose “an indirect but wholly effective means” of achieving a preempted goal
• “When a State acts as a purchaser of services, ‘it does not “regulate” the workings of the market . . . ; it exemplifies them’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).