Skip to main content
· 9/9/1980

Anthony Robert Martin-Trigona v. Nicholas Gouletas

Citations

  • 634 F.2d 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[m]otions for recusal are properly addressed only to the judge who is the object of the motion
  • so applying Sec. 1826(a) without discussion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Pell, Cud-Ahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.