Anthony Patrick v. City of Chicago

Oral argument

• Argued

  17 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that one of the two situations in which aggregation has been permitted is “in cases in which a single plaintiff seeks to aggregate two or more of his own claims against a single defendant”
• relying on Snyder Smith v. Am. States Preferred Ins. Co. , 394 U.S. at 336
• “[T]he separate and distinct claims of two or more plaintiffs cannot be aggregated, in order to satisfy the jurisdictional requirement.”
• “Aggregation has been permitted ... in cases in which a single plaintiff seeks to aggregate two or more of his own claims against a single defendant.”
• aggregation is permitted “in cases in which a single plaintiff seeks to aggregate two or more of his own claims against a single defendant”
• aggregation is permissible “only (1) in cases in which a single plaintiff seeks to aggregate two or more of his claims against a single defendant and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).