Anthony Murry v. Merrick B. Garland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding investigator had sufficient information to determine existence of child abuse or neglect before interviewing defendant because he had already met with medical examiner who provided cause of death, met with officers at least twice, and knew defendant had confessed to offense
• concluding investigator had sufficient information to determine existence of child abuse or neglect before interviewing defendant because he had already met with medical examiner who provided cause of death, met with officers at least twice, and knew defendant had confessed to offense
• explaining the police department called CPS, the CPS investigator met the officers at the crime scene before interviewing the defendant, and officer told investigator defendant confessed
• explaining the police department called CPS, the CPS investigator met the officers at the crime scene before interviewing the defendant, and officer told investigator defendant confessed
• “Although CPS workers are state agents, their state employment alone does not render them law enforcement agents for [the] purpose of ‘defining a custodial interrogation.’”
• “Although CPS workers are state agents, their state employment alone does not render them law enforcement agents for [the] purpose of ‘defining a custodial interrogation.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).