Anthony McCoy v. James R. Gilbert, Frederick H. Aper, David Poggemoeller, Herman S. Nelson and Robert Zachary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies because he “had the opportunity to exhaust, but he simply chose not to”
• holding that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies because he “had the opportunity to exhaust, but he simply chose not to”
• stating that the court must consider “whether the institution has an internal administrative process . . .”
• noting that the Landgraf factors must be applied because “almost every new statute results in some perceptible effect or impact on countless past or pre-existing choices, decisions, and interests of the actors and subjects in the newly-regulated field”
• affirming district court’s sua sponte dismissal without prejudice of claims against all defendants after a single defendant established that plaintiff had failed to exhaust the administrative remedies
• because prison “had the authority to take some sort of action with respect to a tardy complaint,” the prisoner had to make “an attempt to use [the prison’s] administrative process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).