Anthony Mazzeo v. Color Resolutions Int'l, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that modified test did not apply where plaintiff’s position was not eliminated and another individual replaced him
• holding that a physician’s affidavit provided sufficient evidence of disability because it explained the employee’s “medical condition, what specific pain the condition caused, and the limita- tions on ‘major life activities’ (as that term is broadly defined by the ADA
• noting that age-related discrimination actions under the FCRA are analyzed under the same frameworks as the ADEA
• providing that but-for causation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act is the plaintiff’s trial burden
• noting that age-related discrimination actions under the FCRA are analyzed under the same frameworks as the ADEA
• explaining that, for ADA discrimination claims, a plaintiff must show that she had a disability “at the time of the adverse employment action.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).