Anthony Mauro v. Southern New England Telecommunications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court did not err in refusing to consider an unpled claim raised for the first time in opposition papers
• assuming that positions were not posted but finding that summary judgment was proper because plaintiff failed to rebut defendant's legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for adverse employment actions
• holding the application requirement inapplicable when the plaintiff was “unaware of specific available positions because the employer never posted them”
• finding that summary judgment was proper on failure to promote claim because of lack of showing of pretext or discrimination when positions were not posted and two candidates were chosen without competitive process
• concluding that the district court did not err in refusing to consider plaintiff’s ADEA claim, raised for the first time in papers opposing a summary judgment motion, even where plaintiff could not have known about the claim and had not previously moved to amend the complaint
• finding that the defendant knew of the plaintiff’s interest in being promoted to a specific title but nonetheless failed to make him aware of any promotion opportunities to those positions as they arose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).