Anthony L. Carroll, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The record reflects, however, that the judge’s oral pronouncement and the court’s written judgment find Carroll to be a prior offender, but not a persistent offender.”
• “When a movant alleges sufficient facts to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing under Rule 29.15, courts may not dismiss the motion based on what the witness ‘would have’ testified to at the hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).