Anthony Joseph Majoy v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that petitioner’s “attempt to place blame on his previous attorney and to assign his reliance on that attorney 27 having made timely filing ‘impossible’ f[ell] short of the circumstances required to” demonstrate equitable tolling
• discussing only the Schlup standard and requiring the district court to determine whether the petitioner could demonstrate a miscarriage of justice pursuant to Schlup
• remanding because the district court failed to consider petitioner’s properly raised Schlup claim
• “[I]f Dominguez's recantation is the familiar, untrustworthy, and unreliable about-face by a self-interested criminal, as argued by the Respondent and echoed by the California Court of Appeal in denying Majoy’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, then Majoy's petition will have failed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).