Anthony Johnson v. Richard Kamminga, G. Brown, Lieutenant Dave Conover

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court’s dismissal for failure to prosecute was not abuse of discretion, despite plaintiff’s contention that he had legitimate medical excuse, given inconsistencies in plaintiff’s story and history of delay
• noting that plaintiff’s failure to move to alter judgment and submit evidence corroborating claim of excusable neglect undercut argument that dismissal was abuse of discretion
• noting that such a rule would effectively grant “each litigant one opportunity to disregard the court’s schedule without fear of penalty”
• noting that plaintiff’s failure to move to alter judgment and submit evidence corroborating claim of excusable neglect undercut argument that dismissal was abuse of discretion
• noting that such a rule would effectively grant “each litigant one opportunity to disregard the court’s schedule without fear of penalty”
• rejecting a warning requirement that \would in effect be granting each litigant one opportunity to disregard the court's schedule without fear of penalty\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).