ANTHONY J. IEMMA v. MARGARET HEICHBERGER, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF JOSEPH P. D'ANGELO and INGRID PALMER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that challengers were likely to succeed on the merits of their challenge to the President’s vaccine mandate for federal contractors
• “[F]ederal courts should not issue relief that extends further than necessary to remedy the plaintiff’s injury.”
• highlighting the importance of the likelihood-of-success prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).