Anthony J. Caserta v. Home Lines Agency, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in some circumstances, the Act requires the company “ ‘at its peril ... to keep track of the amount of overtime worked by . its employees . . ..’ George Lawley & Son Corp. v. South, 1 Cir., 140 F.2d 439, 442 .. ..”
• rejecting employer’s argument that the plaintiff was precluded by estoppel from challenging his own time sheets and holding that such an argument is “inconsistent with both the language and the policy of the Fair Labor Standards Act”
• “Counsel for plaintiff is allowed an additional 7 $150 for his services on this appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).