Anthony Grigsby v. Zettie Cotton, Superintendent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Application of Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 36 (1967) interpreted Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541, 561 (1966) “as confirming a juvenile’s right to counsel” at such a hearing
• finding forfeiture where the government failed to object to a habeas petitioner's timeliness or procedural default in the district court
• finding forfeiture where No. 18-3251 15 the government failed to object to a habeas petitioner’s time- liness or procedural default in the district court
• declining to enforce procedural default when untimeliness should have been clear to the State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).