Anthony CICCONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OF the UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a similar argument because there is no constitutional entitlement to security benefits and “Applying for benefits is a voluntary action”
• “[A]lthough no motion for substitution has been filed in this Court, we may proceed to decide [decedent]’s appeal.” (citation omitted)
• claimant’s failure to furnish information required by Secretary warranted denial of benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).